Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-977XU vs QNAP TS-977XU-RP

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-977XU3 ahead
TS-977XU-RP3 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TS-977XUdraws 64.2 W, 12.2 W less than the TS-977XU-RP
  • Spec leadeach leads on 3 of 6 differing specs
  • Best forTS-977XU-RP for creators moving large video files fast

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-977XU and the QNAP TS-977XU-RP on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 6 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-977XU leads on 3 (weight, volume, and operating power) and the QNAP TS-977XU-RP on 3 (CPU cores, boost clock, and base RAM). On our 10GbE video editing index, the TS-977XU-RP scores 82/100 against 79/100.

Using the 13 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-977XU and QNAP TS-977XU-RP compare. CPU cores: the TS-977XU-RP at 6 cores versus 4 cores for the TS-977XU, 2 cores more (1.5x). Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-977XU-RP ranks in the top 13% and the TS-977XU in the top 22%. The TS-977XU-RP leads on boost clock, 3.9 GHz to 3.1 GHz, 1.3x. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-977XU-RP ranks in the top 18% and the TS-977XU in the top 36%. On base RAM, the TS-977XU-RP posts 8 GB and the TS-977XU 4 GB, a gap of 4 GB. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-977XU-RP ranks in the top 23% and the TS-977XU in the bottom 47%. Weight: the TS-977XU at 7.44 kg versus 8.62 kg for the TS-977XU-RP, 1.18 kg lower (1.2x). Among 212 QNAP models, the TS-977XU ranks in the top 44% and the TS-977XU-RP in the bottom 48%.

Key differences 3

Base RAMTS-977XU-RP leads

  • TS-977XU-RP 8 GB vs the TS-977XU at 4 GB
  • the TS-977XU-RP has 2.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-977XU-RP in the top 23%, TS-977XU in the bottom 47%

8 GB out of the box for several apps

CPU coresTS-977XU-RP leads

  • TS-977XU-RP 6 cores vs the TS-977XU at 4 cores
  • the TS-977XU-RP has 1.5x the CPU cores
  • among 204 QNAP models: TS-977XU-RP in the top 13%, TS-977XU in the top 22%

6 cores for backups and transcodes at once

Boost clockTS-977XU-RP leads

  • TS-977XU-RP 3.9 GHz vs the TS-977XU at 3.1 GHz
  • the TS-977XU-RP is 1.3x higher
  • among 201 QNAP models: TS-977XU-RP in the top 18%, TS-977XU in the top 36%

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-977XUTS-977XU-RP
Base RAM4 GBbottom 47%8 GBWINtop 23%
CPU cores4top 22%6WINtop 13%
Boost clock3.1 GHztop 36%3.9 GHzWINtop 18%
Operating power64.2 WWINbottom 49%76.4 Wbottom 39%
Weight7.44 kgWINtop 44%8.62 kgbottom 48%
Volume10.1 LWINtop 39%10.6 Ltop 41%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-977XUTS-977XU-RP
Drive bays9top 29%9top 29%
CPU cores4top 22%6WINtop 13%
Boost clock3.1 GHztop 36%3.9 GHzWINtop 18%
Base RAM4 GBbottom 47%8 GBWINtop 23%
Max RAM64 GBtop 19%64 GBtop 19%
Max LAN speed10 Gbpstop 2%10 Gbpstop 2%
LAN ports4top 18%4top 18%
PCIe slots1top 49%1top 49%
USB ports5top 18%5top 18%
Weight7.44 kgWINtop 44%8.62 kgbottom 48%
Volume10.1 LWINtop 39%10.6 Ltop 41%
Operating power64.2 WWINbottom 49%76.4 Wbottom 39%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%3 yrtop 7%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-977XUTS-977XU-RP
Performance percentile68.887WIN
Lightness percentile56.4WIN47.2
Compactness percentile60.6WIN58.6
Small office fit100100
10GbE video editing fit7982WIN
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • Operating power matters most → the TS-977XU (64.2 W vs 76.4 W)
  • Base RAM matters most → the TS-977XU-RP (8 GB vs 4 GB)

More TS-977XU leads

  • Operating power: 64.2 W vs 76.4 W
  • Weight: 7.44 kg vs 8.62 kg
  • Volume: 10.1 L vs 10.6 L

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): 22 Gbps on both
  • Operating power per bay: TS-977XU 7.14 W vs 8.49 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-977XU 0.83 kg vs 0.96 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TS-977XU 60 GB vs 56 GB

Same on both

  • drive bays 9, max RAM 64 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps, LAN ports 4
  • PCIe slots 1, USB ports 5, warranty 3 years

Use-case scores

  • 10GbE video editing: TS-977XU-RP 82 vs 79

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-977XU or the QNAP TS-977XU-RP?
The TS-977XU, with 64.2 W against 76.4 W for the TS-977XU-RP.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-977XU or the QNAP TS-977XU-RP?
The TS-977XU, with 7.44 kg against 8.62 kg for the TS-977XU-RP.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-977XU and the QNAP TS-977XU-RP?
10GbE video editing: the TS-977XU-RP. (based on our own use-case index)