Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-855EU vs QNAP TS-977XU-RP

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-855EU3 ahead
TS-977XU-RP7 ahead
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TS-977XU-RP7 of 10 differing specs (drive bays 9, boost clock 3.9 GHz)
  • Best forTS-977XU-RP for creators moving large video files fast

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-855EU and the QNAP TS-977XU-RP on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 10 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-855EU leads on 3 (CPU cores, PCIe slots, and weight) and the QNAP TS-977XU-RP on 7 (drive bays, boost clock, max LAN speed, and 4 more). On our 10GbE video editing index, the TS-977XU-RP scores 82/100 against 52/100.

Using the 13 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-855EU and QNAP TS-977XU-RP compare. Drive bays: the TS-977XU-RP at 9 bays versus 8 bays for the TS-855EU, 1 bay more. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-977XU-RP ranks in the top 29% and the TS-855EU in the top 35%. The TS-855EU leads on CPU cores, 8 cores to 6 cores, 1.3x. Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-855EU ranks in the top 3% and the TS-977XU-RP in the top 13%. On boost clock, the TS-977XU-RP posts 3.9 GHz and the TS-855EU 2.8 GHz, a gap of 1.1 GHz. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-977XU-RP ranks in the top 18% and the TS-855EU in the top 47%. Max LAN speed: the TS-977XU-RP at 10 Gbps versus 2.5 Gbps for the TS-855EU, 7.5 Gbps higher (4.0x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-977XU-RP ranks in the top 2% and the TS-855EU in the bottom 48%.

Key differences 3

Max LAN speedTS-977XU-RP leads

  • TS-977XU-RP 10 Gbps vs the TS-855EU at 2.5 Gbps
  • the TS-977XU-RP is 4.0x faster
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-977XU-RP in the top 2%, TS-855EU in the bottom 48%

100 GB copy: about 80 s vs about 5 min (theoretical)

LAN portsTS-977XU-RP leads

  • TS-977XU-RP 4 ports vs the TS-855EU at 2 ports
  • the TS-977XU-RP has 2.0x the LAN ports
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-977XU-RP in the top 18%, TS-855EU in the bottom 38%

4 ports for link bonding or separate networks

PCIe slotsTS-855EU leads

  • TS-855EU 2 slots vs the TS-977XU-RP at 1 slot
  • the TS-855EU has 2.0x the PCIe slots
  • among 146 QNAP models: TS-855EU in the top 21%, TS-977XU-RP in the top 49%

2 PCIe slot(s) for a 10GbE card later

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-855EUTS-977XU-RP
Max LAN speed2.5 Gbpsbottom 48%10 GbpsWINtop 2%
LAN ports2bottom 38%4WINtop 18%
PCIe slots2WINtop 21%1top 49%
Boost clock2.8 GHztop 47%3.9 GHzWINtop 18%
CPU cores8WINtop 3%6top 13%
USB ports4top 35%5WINtop 18%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-855EUTS-977XU-RP
Drive bays8top 35%9WINtop 29%
CPU cores8WINtop 3%6top 13%
Boost clock2.8 GHztop 47%3.9 GHzWINtop 18%
Base RAM8 GBtop 23%8 GBtop 23%
Max RAM64 GBtop 19%64 GBtop 19%
Max LAN speed2.5 Gbpsbottom 48%10 GbpsWINtop 2%
LAN ports2bottom 38%4WINtop 18%
M.2 slots2top 4%–
PCIe slots2WINtop 21%1top 49%
USB ports4top 35%5WINtop 18%
Weight8.1 kgWINbottom 50%8.62 kgbottom 48%
Volume11.4 Ltop 46%10.6 LWINtop 41%
Operating power79.1 Wbottom 35%76.4 WWINbottom 39%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%3 yrtop 7%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-855EUTS-977XU-RP
Performance percentile79.487WIN
Lightness percentile48.8WIN47.2
Compactness percentile5358.6WIN
Home media server fit35No data
Small office fit100100
10GbE video editing fit5282WIN
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • PCIe slots matters most → the TS-855EU (2 slots vs 1 slot)
  • Max LAN speed matters most → the TS-977XU-RP (10 Gbps vs 2.5 Gbps)

More TS-855EU leads

  • CPU cores: 8 cores vs 6 cores
  • Weight: 8.1 kg vs 8.62 kg

More TS-977XU-RP leads (performance and memory)

  • Boost clock: 3.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz

More TS-977XU-RP leads (storage and connections)

  • USB ports: 5 ports vs 4 ports
  • Drive bays: 9 bays vs 8 bays

More TS-977XU-RP leads (size, power and warranty)

  • Volume: 10.6 L vs 11.4 L
  • Operating power: 76.4 W vs 79.1 W

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TS-977XU-RP 22 Gbps vs 5 Gbps
  • Operating power per bay: TS-977XU-RP 8.49 W vs 9.89 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-977XU-RP 0.96 kg vs 1.01 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): 56 GB on both

Same on both

  • base RAM 8 GB, max RAM 64 GB, warranty 3 years

Use-case scores

  • 10GbE video editing: TS-977XU-RP 82 vs 52

Variant TS-855EU-RP

  • matches the TS-855EU on drive bays, CPU cores, boost clock, and 9 more but differs on weight (9.47 kg vs 8.1 kg) and operating power (78.7 W vs 79.1 W).
  • Where values differ, this comparison does not carry over to the TS-855EU-RP.

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which has the faster built-in LAN, the QNAP TS-855EU or the QNAP TS-977XU-RP?
The TS-977XU-RP, with 10 Gbps against 2.5 Gbps for the TS-855EU.
Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TS-855EU or the QNAP TS-977XU-RP?
The TS-977XU-RP, with 9 bays against 8 bays for the TS-855EU.
Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-855EU or the QNAP TS-977XU-RP?
The TS-977XU-RP, with 76.4 W against 79.1 W for the TS-855EU.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-855EU or the QNAP TS-977XU-RP?
The TS-855EU, with 8.1 kg against 8.62 kg for the TS-977XU-RP.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-855EU and the QNAP TS-977XU-RP?
10GbE video editing: the TS-977XU-RP. (based on our own use-case index)