Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-855EU vs QNAP TS-873AEU

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-855EU4 ahead
TS-873AEU1 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TS-873AEUdraws 52.5 W, 26.6 W less than the TS-855EU
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TS-855EU4 of 6 differing specs (CPU cores 8, boost clock 2.8 GHz)
  • Best forTS-855EU for creators moving large video files fast

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-855EU and the QNAP TS-873AEU on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 6 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-855EU leads on 4 (CPU cores, boost clock, base RAM, and 1 more) and the QNAP TS-873AEU on 1 (operating power); 1 is within 2%. On our home media server index, the TS-855EU scores 35/100 against 31/100.

Using the 14 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-855EU and QNAP TS-873AEU compare. CPU cores: the TS-855EU at 8 cores versus 4 cores for the TS-873AEU, 4 cores more (2.0x). Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-855EU ranks in the top 3% and the TS-873AEU in the top 22%. The TS-855EU leads on boost clock, 2.8 GHz to 2.2 GHz, 1.3x. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-855EU ranks in the top 47% and the TS-873AEU in the bottom 37%. On base RAM, the TS-855EU posts 8 GB and the TS-873AEU 4 GB, a gap of 4 GB. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-855EU ranks in the top 23% and the TS-873AEU in the bottom 47%. PCIe slots: the TS-855EU at 2 slots versus 1 slot for the TS-873AEU, 1 slot more (2.0x). Among 146 QNAP models, the TS-855EU ranks in the top 21% and the TS-873AEU in the top 49%.

Key differences 3

CPU coresTS-855EU leads

  • TS-855EU 8 cores vs the TS-873AEU at 4 cores
  • the TS-855EU has 2.0x the CPU cores
  • among 204 QNAP models: TS-855EU in the top 3%, TS-873AEU in the top 22%

8 cores for backups and transcodes at once

Base RAMTS-855EU leads

  • TS-855EU 8 GB vs the TS-873AEU at 4 GB
  • the TS-855EU has 2.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-855EU in the top 23%, TS-873AEU in the bottom 47%

8 GB out of the box for several apps

PCIe slotsTS-855EU leads

  • TS-855EU 2 slots vs the TS-873AEU at 1 slot
  • the TS-855EU has 2.0x the PCIe slots
  • among 146 QNAP models: TS-855EU in the top 21%, TS-873AEU in the top 49%

2 PCIe slot(s) for a 10GbE card later

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-855EUTS-873AEU
CPU cores8WINtop 3%4top 22%
Base RAM8 GBWINtop 23%4 GBbottom 47%
PCIe slots2WINtop 21%1top 49%
Operating power79.1 Wbottom 35%52.5 WWINtop 39%
Boost clock2.8 GHzWINtop 47%2.2 GHzbottom 37%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-855EUTS-873AEU
Drive bays8top 35%8top 35%
CPU cores8WINtop 3%4top 22%
Boost clock2.8 GHzWINtop 47%2.2 GHzbottom 37%
Base RAM8 GBWINtop 23%4 GBbottom 47%
Max RAM64 GBtop 19%64 GBtop 19%
Max LAN speed2.5 Gbpsbottom 48%2.5 Gbpsbottom 48%
LAN ports2bottom 38%2bottom 38%
M.2 slots2top 4%2top 4%
PCIe slots2WINtop 21%1top 49%
USB ports4top 35%4top 35%
Weight8.1 kgbottom 50%7.97 kgtop 50%
Volume11.4 Ltop 46%11.4 Ltop 46%
Operating power79.1 Wbottom 35%52.5 WWINtop 39%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%3 yrtop 7%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-855EUTS-873AEU
Performance percentile79.4WIN41.4
Lightness percentile48.850.7WIN
Compactness percentile5353
Home media server fit35WIN31
Small office fit100100
10GbE video editing fit52WIN44
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • CPU cores matters most → the TS-855EU (8 cores vs 4 cores)
  • Operating power matters most → the TS-873AEU (52.5 W vs 79.1 W)

More TS-855EU leads

  • Boost clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz

More TS-873AEU leads

  • Operating power: 52.5 W vs 79.1 W

Combined metrics

  • Expansion slots in total (M.2 plus PCIe): TS-855EU 4 vs 3
  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): 5 Gbps on both
  • Operating power per bay: TS-873AEU 6.56 W vs 9.89 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-873AEU 1 kg vs 1.01 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TS-873AEU 60 GB vs 56 GB

Within 2%

  • Weight: TS-855EU 8.1 kg, TS-873AEU 7.97 kg

Same on both

  • drive bays 8, max RAM 64 GB, max LAN speed 2.5 Gbps, LAN ports 2
  • M.2 slots 2, USB ports 4, volume 11.4 L, warranty 3 years

Use-case scores

  • Home media server: TS-855EU 35 vs 31
  • 10GbE video editing: TS-855EU 52 vs 44

Variant TS-855EU-RP

  • matches the TS-855EU on drive bays, CPU cores, boost clock, and 9 more but differs on weight (9.47 kg vs 8.1 kg) and operating power (78.7 W vs 79.1 W).
  • Where values differ, this comparison does not carry over to the TS-855EU-RP.

Variant TS-873AEU-RP

  • matches the TS-873AEU on drive bays, CPU cores, boost clock, and 9 more but differs on weight (9.2 kg vs 7.97 kg) and operating power (58.1 W vs 52.5 W).
  • Where values differ, this comparison does not carry over to the TS-873AEU-RP.

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-855EU or the QNAP TS-873AEU?
The TS-873AEU, with 52.5 W against 79.1 W for the TS-855EU.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-855EU and the QNAP TS-873AEU?
10GbE video editing: the TS-855EU. (based on our own use-case index)