Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-983XU vs QNAP TS-H977XU-RP

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-983XU4 ahead
TS-H977XU-RP3 ahead
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TS-983XU4 of 7 differing specs (USB ports 6, weight 7.48 kg)
  • Best forTS-H977XU-RP for creators moving large video files fast

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-983XU and the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 7 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-983XU leads on 4 (USB ports, weight, volume, and 1 more) and the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP on 3 (CPU cores, boost clock, and base RAM). On our 10GbE video editing index, the TS-H977XU-RP scores 84/100 against 81/100.

Using the 13 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-983XU and QNAP TS-H977XU-RP compare. CPU cores: the TS-H977XU-RP at 8 cores versus 4 cores for the TS-983XU, 4 cores more (2.0x). Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-H977XU-RP ranks in the top 3% and the TS-983XU in the top 22%. The TS-H977XU-RP leads on boost clock, 4.4 GHz to 4.3 GHz. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-H977XU-RP ranks in the top 9% and the TS-983XU in the top 13%. On base RAM, the TS-H977XU-RP posts 32 GB and the TS-983XU 8 GB, a gap of 24 GB. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-H977XU-RP ranks in the top 7% and the TS-983XU in the top 23%. USB ports: the TS-983XU at 6 ports versus 5 ports for the TS-H977XU-RP, 1 port more (1.2x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-983XU ranks in the top 4% and the TS-H977XU-RP in the top 18%.

Key differences 3

Base RAMTS-H977XU-RP leads

  • TS-H977XU-RP 32 GB vs the TS-983XU at 8 GB
  • the TS-H977XU-RP has 4.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-H977XU-RP in the top 7%, TS-983XU in the top 23%

32 GB out of the box for several apps

CPU coresTS-H977XU-RP leads

  • TS-H977XU-RP 8 cores vs the TS-983XU at 4 cores
  • the TS-H977XU-RP has 2.0x the CPU cores
  • among 204 QNAP models: TS-H977XU-RP in the top 3%, TS-983XU in the top 22%

8 cores for backups and transcodes at once

USB portsTS-983XU leads

  • TS-983XU 6 ports vs the TS-H977XU-RP at 5 ports
  • the TS-983XU has 1.2x the USB ports
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-983XU in the top 4%, TS-H977XU-RP in the top 18%

1 more USB for drives or a UPS

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-983XUTS-H977XU-RP
Base RAM8 GBtop 23%32 GBWINtop 7%
CPU cores4top 22%8WINtop 3%
USB ports6WINtop 4%5top 18%
Weight7.48 kgWINtop 45%8.62 kgbottom 48%
Volume10.1 LWINtop 39%10.6 Ltop 41%
Operating power74.4 WWINbottom 40%76.4 Wbottom 39%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-983XUTS-H977XU-RP
Drive bays9top 29%9top 29%
CPU cores4top 22%8WINtop 3%
Boost clock4.3 GHztop 13%4.4 GHzWINtop 9%
Base RAM8 GBtop 23%32 GBWINtop 7%
Max RAM128 GBtop 6%128 GBtop 6%
Max LAN speed10 Gbpstop 2%10 Gbpstop 2%
LAN ports4top 18%4top 18%
PCIe slots1top 49%1top 49%
USB ports6WINtop 4%5top 18%
Weight7.48 kgWINtop 45%8.62 kgbottom 48%
Volume10.1 LWINtop 39%10.6 Ltop 41%
Operating power74.4 WWINbottom 40%76.4 Wbottom 39%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%3 yrtop 7%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-983XUTS-H977XU-RP
Performance percentile8294.8WIN
Lightness percentile55.2WIN47.2
Compactness percentile60.6WIN58.6
Small office fit100100
10GbE video editing fit8184WIN
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • USB ports matters most → the TS-983XU (6 ports vs 5 ports)
  • Base RAM matters most → the TS-H977XU-RP (32 GB vs 8 GB)

More TS-983XU leads

  • Weight: 7.48 kg vs 8.62 kg
  • Volume: 10.1 L vs 10.6 L
  • Operating power: 74.4 W vs 76.4 W

More TS-H977XU-RP leads

  • Boost clock: 4.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): 22 Gbps on both
  • Operating power per bay: TS-983XU 8.26 W vs 8.49 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-983XU 0.83 kg vs 0.96 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TS-983XU 120 GB vs 96 GB

Same on both

  • drive bays 9, max RAM 128 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps
  • LAN ports 4, PCIe slots 1, warranty 3 years

Use-case scores

  • 10GbE video editing: TS-H977XU-RP 84 vs 81

Variant TS-983XU-RP

  • matches the TS-983XU on drive bays, CPU cores, boost clock, and 7 more but differs on weight (8.63 kg vs 7.48 kg), volume (10.6 L vs 10.1 L), and operating power (84.7 W vs 74.4 W).
  • Where values differ, this comparison does not carry over to the TS-983XU-RP.

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-983XU or the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP?
The TS-983XU, with 74.4 W against 76.4 W for the TS-H977XU-RP.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-983XU or the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP?
The TS-983XU, with 7.48 kg against 8.62 kg for the TS-H977XU-RP.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-983XU and the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP?
10GbE video editing: the TS-H977XU-RP. (based on our own use-case index)