Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-H977XU-RP vs QNAP TS-H987XU-RP

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-H977XU-RP4 ahead
TS-H987XU-RP3 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TS-H977XU-RPdraws 76.4 W, 44.1 W less than the TS-H987XU-RP
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TS-H977XU-RP4 of 7 differing specs (base RAM 32 GB, USB ports 5)

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP and the QNAP TS-H987XU-RP on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 7 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP leads on 4 (base RAM, USB ports, weight, and 1 more) and the QNAP TS-H987XU-RP on 3 (boost clock, volume, and warranty).

Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP and QNAP TS-H987XU-RP compare. Boost clock: the TS-H987XU-RP at 4.8 GHz versus 4.4 GHz for the TS-H977XU-RP, 0.4 GHz higher. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-H987XU-RP ranks in the top 6% and the TS-H977XU-RP in the top 9%. The TS-H977XU-RP leads on base RAM, 32 GB to 16 GB, 2.0x. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-H977XU-RP ranks in the top 7% and the TS-H987XU-RP in the top 14%. On USB ports, the TS-H977XU-RP posts 5 ports and the TS-H987XU-RP 4 ports, a gap of 1 port. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-H977XU-RP ranks in the top 18% and the TS-H987XU-RP in the top 35%. Weight: the TS-H977XU-RP at 8.62 kg versus 9.5 kg for the TS-H987XU-RP, 0.88 kg lower. Among 212 QNAP models, the TS-H977XU-RP ranks in the bottom 48% and the TS-H987XU-RP in the bottom 37%.

Key differences 3

Base RAMTS-H977XU-RP leads

  • TS-H977XU-RP 32 GB vs the TS-H987XU-RP at 16 GB
  • the TS-H977XU-RP has 2.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-H977XU-RP in the top 7%, TS-H987XU-RP in the top 14%

32 GB out of the box for several apps

WarrantyTS-H987XU-RP leads

  • TS-H987XU-RP 5 years vs the TS-H977XU-RP at 3 years
  • the TS-H987XU-RP is 1.7x longer
  • among 214 QNAP models: TS-H987XU-RP in the top 1%, TS-H977XU-RP in the top 7%

2 more year(s) of free repairs

Operating powerTS-H977XU-RP leads

  • TS-H977XU-RP 76.4 W vs the TS-H987XU-RP at 120.6 W
  • the TS-H977XU-RP: 44.2 W less power
  • among 208 QNAP models: TS-H977XU-RP in the bottom 39%, TS-H987XU-RP in the bottom 17%

about 386.8 kWh less per year if left on 24/7

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-H977XU-RPTS-H987XU-RP
Base RAM32 GBWINtop 7%16 GBtop 14%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%5 yrWINtop 1%
Operating power76.4 WWINbottom 39%120.6 Wbottom 17%
USB ports5WINtop 18%4top 35%
Volume10.6 Ltop 41%8.92 LWINtop 29%
Weight8.62 kgWINbottom 48%9.5 kgbottom 37%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-H977XU-RPTS-H987XU-RP
Drive bays9top 29%9top 29%
CPU cores8top 3%–
Boost clock4.4 GHztop 9%4.8 GHzWINtop 6%
Base RAM32 GBWINtop 7%16 GBtop 14%
Max RAM128 GBtop 6%128 GBtop 6%
Max LAN speed10 Gbpstop 2%10 Gbpstop 2%
LAN ports4top 18%4top 18%
M.2 slots–0bottom 46%
PCIe slots1top 49%1top 49%
USB ports5WINtop 18%4top 35%
Weight8.62 kgWINbottom 48%9.5 kgbottom 37%
Volume10.6 Ltop 41%8.92 LWINtop 29%
Operating power76.4 WWINbottom 39%120.6 Wbottom 17%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%5 yrWINtop 1%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-H977XU-RPTS-H987XU-RP
Performance percentile94.8No data
Lightness percentile47.2WIN36.5
Compactness percentile58.669.9WIN
Small office fit100100
10GbE video editing fit84No data
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • Base RAM matters most → the TS-H977XU-RP (32 GB vs 16 GB)
  • Warranty matters most → the TS-H987XU-RP (5 years vs 3 years)

More TS-H977XU-RP leads

  • USB ports: 5 ports vs 4 ports
  • Weight: 8.62 kg vs 9.5 kg

More TS-H987XU-RP leads

  • Volume: 8.92 L vs 10.6 L
  • Boost clock: 4.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TS-H987XU-RP 25 Gbps vs 22 Gbps
  • Operating power per bay: TS-H977XU-RP 8.49 W vs 13.4 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-H977XU-RP 0.96 kg vs 1.06 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TS-H987XU-RP 112 GB vs 96 GB

Same on both

  • drive bays 9, max RAM 128 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps
  • LAN ports 4, PCIe slots 1

FAQ

Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP or the QNAP TS-H987XU-RP?
The TS-H977XU-RP, with 76.4 W against 120.6 W for the TS-H987XU-RP.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-H977XU-RP or the QNAP TS-H987XU-RP?
The TS-H977XU-RP, with 8.62 kg against 9.5 kg for the TS-H987XU-RP.