As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)
QNAP TS-1683XU-RP vs QNAP TS-H1887XU-RP
The quick verdict
- Lower power drawQNAP TS-1683XU-RPdraws 130.4 W, 18.5 W less than the TS-H1887XU-RP
- Leads on more specsQNAP TS-H1887XU-RP5 of 9 differing specs (drive bays 18, boost clock 4.8 GHz)
Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.
Spec ruler
In short
Bottom line. Of the 9 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP leads on 4 (LAN ports, PCIe slots, USB ports, and 1 more) and the QNAP TS-H1887XU-RP on 5 (drive bays, boost clock, weight, and 2 more).
Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP and QNAP TS-H1887XU-RP compare. Drive bays: the TS-H1887XU-RP at 18 bays versus 16 bays for the TS-1683XU-RP, 2 bays more. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-H1887XU-RP ranks in the top 6% and the TS-1683XU-RP in the top 7%. The TS-H1887XU-RP leads on boost clock, 4.8 GHz to 4.3 GHz. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-H1887XU-RP ranks in the top 6% and the TS-1683XU-RP in the top 13%. On LAN ports, the TS-1683XU-RP posts 6 ports and the TS-H1887XU-RP 4 ports, a gap of 2 ports. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-1683XU-RP ranks in the top 1% and the TS-H1887XU-RP in the top 18%. PCIe slots: the TS-1683XU-RP at 4 slots versus 3 slots for the TS-H1887XU-RP, 1 slot more (1.3x). Among 146 QNAP models, the TS-1683XU-RP ranks in the top 1% and the TS-H1887XU-RP in the top 10%.
Key differences 3
VolumeTS-H1887XU-RP leads
- TS-H1887XU-RP 19.6 L vs the TS-1683XU-RP at 35.9 L
- the TS-H1887XU-RP: 16.3 L smaller
- among 217 QNAP models: TS-H1887XU-RP in the bottom 36%, TS-1683XU-RP in the bottom 7%
16.3 L smaller on the shelf
WarrantyTS-H1887XU-RP leads
- TS-H1887XU-RP 5 years vs the TS-1683XU-RP at 3 years
- the TS-H1887XU-RP is 1.7x longer
- among 214 QNAP models: TS-H1887XU-RP in the top 1%, TS-1683XU-RP in the top 7%
2 more year(s) of free repairs
LAN portsTS-1683XU-RP leads
- TS-1683XU-RP 6 ports vs the TS-H1887XU-RP at 4 ports
- the TS-1683XU-RP has 1.5x the LAN ports
- among 219 QNAP models: TS-1683XU-RP in the top 1%, TS-H1887XU-RP in the top 18%
6 ports for link bonding or separate networks
Key specs at a glance
| Spec | TS-1683XU-RP | TS-H1887XU-RP |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 35.9 Lbottom 7% | 19.6 LWINbottom 35% |
| Warranty | 3 yrtop 7% | 5 yrWINtop 1% |
| LAN ports | 6WINtop 1% | 4top 18% |
| USB ports | 6WINtop 4% | 4top 35% |
| PCIe slots | 4WINtop 1% | 3top 10% |
| Weight | 17.4 kgbottom 6% | 14.9 kgWINbottom 10% |
Show every spec
| Spec | TS-1683XU-RP | TS-H1887XU-RP |
|---|---|---|
| Drive bays | 16top 7% | 18WINtop 6% |
| CPU cores | 4top 22% | – |
| Boost clock | 4.3 GHztop 13% | 4.8 GHzWINtop 6% |
| Base RAM | 16 GBtop 14% | 16 GBtop 14% |
| Max RAM | 128 GBtop 6% | 128 GBtop 6% |
| Max LAN speed | 10 Gbpstop 2% | 10 Gbpstop 2% |
| LAN ports | 6WINtop 1% | 4top 18% |
| M.2 slots | – | 0bottom 46% |
| PCIe slots | 4WINtop 1% | 3top 10% |
| USB ports | 6WINtop 4% | 4top 35% |
| Weight | 17.4 kgbottom 6% | 14.9 kgWINbottom 10% |
| Volume | 35.9 Lbottom 7% | 19.6 LWINbottom 35% |
| Operating power | 130.4 WWINbottom 14% | 148.9 Wbottom 9% |
| Warranty | 3 yrtop 7% | 5 yrWINtop 1% |
| Metric (0–100) | TS-1683XU-RP | TS-H1887XU-RP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance percentile | 84.9 | No data |
| Lightness percentile | 4.7 | 9.5WIN |
| Compactness percentile | 5.6 | 33.6WIN |
| Home media server fit | No data | 0 |
| Small office fit | 100 | 100 |
| 10GbE video editing fit | 82 | No data |
| Low-power compact 24/7 fit | 0 | 0 |
The details
How to choose
- LAN ports matters most → the TS-1683XU-RP (6 ports vs 4 ports)
- Volume matters most → the TS-H1887XU-RP (19.6 L vs 35.9 L)
More TS-1683XU-RP leads
- USB ports: 6 ports vs 4 ports
- PCIe slots: 4 slots vs 3 slots
- Operating power: 130.4 W vs 148.9 W
More TS-H1887XU-RP leads
- Weight: 14.9 kg vs 17.4 kg
- Drive bays: 18 bays vs 16 bays
- Boost clock: 4.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
Combined metrics
- Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TS-H1887XU-RP 25 Gbps vs 24 Gbps
- Operating power per bay: TS-1683XU-RP 8.15 W vs 8.27 W
Combined metrics
- Weight per bay: TS-H1887XU-RP 0.83 kg vs 1.09 kg
- Memory headroom (max minus base): 112 GB on both
Same on both
- base RAM 16 GB, max RAM 128 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps
FAQ
- Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP or the QNAP TS-H1887XU-RP?
- The TS-H1887XU-RP, with 18 bays against 16 bays for the TS-1683XU-RP.
- Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP or the QNAP TS-H1887XU-RP?
- The TS-1683XU-RP, with 130.4 W against 148.9 W for the TS-H1887XU-RP.
- Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP or the QNAP TS-H1887XU-RP?
- The TS-H1887XU-RP, with 14.9 kg against 17.4 kg for the TS-1683XU-RP.