Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-1683XU-RP vs QNAP TS-H2477XU-RP

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-1683XU-RP4 ahead
TS-H2477XU-RP4 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TS-1683XU-RPdraws 130.4 W, 13.5 W less than the TS-H2477XU-RP
  • Spec leadeach leads on 4 of 8 differing specs
  • Best forTS-1683XU-RP for creators moving large video files fast
TS-1683XU-RPCheck Latest Price on Amazon#adBrowse on AliExpress#ad
TS-H2477XU-RPCheck Latest Price on Amazon#adBrowse on AliExpress#ad

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP and the QNAP TS-H2477XU-RP on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 8 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP leads on 4 (LAN ports, weight, volume, and 1 more) and the QNAP TS-H2477XU-RP on 4 (drive bays, CPU cores, boost clock, and 1 more). On our 10GbE video editing index, the TS-1683XU-RP scores 82/100 against 64/100.

Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP and QNAP TS-H2477XU-RP compare. Drive bays: the TS-H2477XU-RP at 24 bays versus 16 bays for the TS-1683XU-RP, 8 bays more (1.5x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-H2477XU-RP ranks in the top 2% and the TS-1683XU-RP in the top 7%. The TS-H2477XU-RP leads on CPU cores, 8 cores to 4 cores, 2.0x. Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-H2477XU-RP ranks in the top 3% and the TS-1683XU-RP in the top 22%. On boost clock, the TS-H2477XU-RP posts 4.4 GHz and the TS-1683XU-RP 4.3 GHz, a gap of 0.1 GHz. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-H2477XU-RP ranks in the top 9% and the TS-1683XU-RP in the top 13%. Base RAM: the TS-H2477XU-RP at 32 GB versus 16 GB for the TS-1683XU-RP, 16 GB higher (2.0x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-H2477XU-RP ranks in the top 7% and the TS-1683XU-RP in the top 14%.

Key differences 3

CPU coresTS-H2477XU-RP leads

  • TS-H2477XU-RP 8 cores vs the TS-1683XU-RP at 4 cores
  • the TS-H2477XU-RP has 2.0x the CPU cores
  • among 204 QNAP models: TS-H2477XU-RP in the top 3%, TS-1683XU-RP in the top 22%

8 cores for backups and transcodes at once

Base RAMTS-H2477XU-RP leads

  • TS-H2477XU-RP 32 GB vs the TS-1683XU-RP at 16 GB
  • the TS-H2477XU-RP has 2.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-H2477XU-RP in the top 7%, TS-1683XU-RP in the top 14%

32 GB out of the box for several apps

Drive baysTS-H2477XU-RP leads

  • TS-H2477XU-RP 24 bays vs the TS-1683XU-RP at 16 bays
  • the TS-H2477XU-RP has 1.5x the drive bays
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-H2477XU-RP in the top 2%, TS-1683XU-RP in the top 7%

With 8 TB drives: 192 TB vs 128 TB raw

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-1683XU-RPTS-H2477XU-RP
CPU cores4top 22%8WINtop 3%
Base RAM16 GBtop 14%32 GBWINtop 7%
Drive bays16top 7%24WINtop 2%
LAN ports6WINtop 1%4top 18%
Volume35.9 LWINbottom 7%49 Lbottom 4%
Weight17.4 kgWINbottom 6%22.7 kgbottom 3%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-1683XU-RPTS-H2477XU-RP
Drive bays16top 7%24WINtop 2%
CPU cores4top 22%8WINtop 3%
Boost clock4.3 GHztop 13%4.4 GHzWINtop 9%
Base RAM16 GBtop 14%32 GBWINtop 7%
Max RAM128 GBtop 6%128 GBtop 6%
Max LAN speed10 Gbpstop 2%10 Gbpstop 2%
LAN ports6WINtop 1%4top 18%
PCIe slots4top 1%–
USB ports6top 4%6top 4%
Weight17.4 kgWINbottom 6%22.7 kgbottom 3%
Volume35.9 LWINbottom 7%49 Lbottom 4%
Operating power130.4 WWINbottom 14%144 Wbottom 10%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%3 yrtop 7%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-1683XU-RPTS-H2477XU-RP
Performance percentile84.992.7WIN
Lightness percentile4.7WIN1.9
Compactness percentile5.6WIN2.3
Small office fit100100
10GbE video editing fit82WIN64
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • LAN ports matters most → the TS-1683XU-RP (6 ports vs 4 ports)
  • CPU cores matters most → the TS-H2477XU-RP (8 cores vs 4 cores)

More TS-1683XU-RP leads (storage and connections)

  • LAN ports: 6 ports vs 4 ports

More TS-1683XU-RP leads (size, power and warranty)

  • Volume: 35.9 L vs 49 L
  • Weight: 17.4 kg vs 22.7 kg
  • Operating power: 130.4 W vs 144 W

More TS-H2477XU-RP leads

  • Boost clock: 4.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TS-1683XU-RP 24 Gbps vs 22 Gbps
  • Operating power per bay: TS-H2477XU-RP 6 W vs 8.15 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-H2477XU-RP 0.95 kg vs 1.09 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TS-1683XU-RP 112 GB vs 96 GB

Same on both

  • max RAM 128 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps, USB ports 6, warranty 3 years

Use-case scores

  • 10GbE video editing: TS-1683XU-RP 82 vs 64

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP or the QNAP TS-H2477XU-RP?
The TS-H2477XU-RP, with 24 bays against 16 bays for the TS-1683XU-RP.
Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP or the QNAP TS-H2477XU-RP?
The TS-1683XU-RP, with 130.4 W against 144 W for the TS-H2477XU-RP.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP or the QNAP TS-H2477XU-RP?
The TS-1683XU-RP, with 17.4 kg against 22.7 kg for the TS-H2477XU-RP.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-1683XU-RP and the QNAP TS-H2477XU-RP?
10GbE video editing: the TS-1683XU-RP. (based on our own use-case index)