As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress and Coupang affiliate links; Coupang: 이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로, 이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.)
QNAP TS-131P vs QNAP TS-233
The quick verdict
- Leads on more specsQNAP TS-2336 of 8 differing specs (drive bays 2, CPU cores 4)
- Best forTS-233 for anyone running it 24/7 on little power
Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.
Spec ruler
In short
Bottom line. Of the 8 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-131P leads on 1 (weight) and the QNAP TS-233 on 6 (drive bays, CPU cores, boost clock, and 3 more); 1 is within 2%. On our small-office file server index, the TS-233 scores 18/100 against 7/100.
Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-131P and QNAP TS-233 compare. Drive bays: the TS-233 at 2 bays versus 1 bay for the TS-131P, 1 bay more (2.0x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-233 ranks in the bottom 11% and the TS-131P in the bottom 3%. The TS-233 leads on CPU cores, 4 cores to 2 cores, 2.0x. Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-233 ranks in the top 22% and the TS-131P in the bottom 9%. On boost clock, the TS-233 posts 2 GHz and the TS-131P 1.7 GHz, a gap of 0.3 GHz. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-233 ranks in the bottom 27% and the TS-131P in the bottom 19%. Base RAM: the TS-233 at 2 GB versus 1 GB for the TS-131P, 1 GB higher (2.0x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-233 ranks in the bottom 14% and the TS-131P in the bottom 6%.
Key differences 3
Drive baysTS-233 leads
- TS-233 2 bays vs the TS-131P at 1 bay
- the TS-233 has 2.0x the drive bays
- among 219 QNAP models: TS-233 in the bottom 11%, TS-131P in the bottom 3%
With 8 TB drives: 16 TB vs 8 TB raw
CPU coresTS-233 leads
- TS-233 4 cores vs the TS-131P at 2 cores
- the TS-233 has 2.0x the CPU cores
- among 204 QNAP models: TS-233 in the top 22%, TS-131P in the bottom 9%
4 cores for backups and transcodes at once
Base RAMTS-233 leads
- TS-233 2 GB vs the TS-131P at 1 GB
- the TS-233 has 2.0x the base RAM
- among 219 QNAP models: TS-233 in the bottom 14%, TS-131P in the bottom 6%
2 GB out of the box for several apps
Key specs at a glance
| Spec | TS-131P | TS-233 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive bays | 1bottom 3% | 2WINbottom 11% |
| CPU cores | 2bottom 9% | 4WINtop 22% |
| Base RAM | 1 GBbottom 6% | 2 GBWINbottom 14% |
| Max RAM | 1 GBbottom 5% | 2 GBWINbottom 6% |
| Weight | 1.16 kgWINtop 2% | 1.69 kgtop 10% |
| Boost clock | 1.7 GHzbottom 19% | 2 GHzWINbottom 27% |
Show every spec
| Spec | TS-131P | TS-233 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive bays | 1bottom 3% | 2WINbottom 11% |
| CPU cores | 2bottom 9% | 4WINtop 22% |
| Boost clock | 1.7 GHzbottom 19% | 2 GHzWINbottom 27% |
| Base RAM | 1 GBbottom 6% | 2 GBWINbottom 14% |
| Max RAM | 1 GBbottom 5% | 2 GBWINbottom 6% |
| Max LAN speed | 1 Gbpsbottom 22% | 1 Gbpsbottom 22% |
| LAN ports | 1bottom 8% | 1bottom 8% |
| USB ports | 3bottom 27% | 3bottom 27% |
| Weight | 1.16 kgWINtop 2% | 1.69 kgtop 10% |
| Volume | 2.7 Ltop 4% | 2.69 Ltop 4% |
| Operating power | 11.6 Wtop 2% | 10.8 WWINtop 2% |
| Warranty | 2 yrbottom 35% | 2 yrbottom 35% |
| Metric (0–100) | TS-131P | TS-233 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance percentile | 0.5 | 6.2WIN |
| Lightness percentile | 98.1WIN | 90.5 |
| Compactness percentile | 96.1 | 96.8WIN |
| Small office fit | 7 | 18WIN |
| 10GbE video editing fit | 0 | 1WIN |
| Low-power compact 24/7 fit | 85 | 86WIN |
The details
How to choose
- Weight matters most → the TS-131P (1.16 kg vs 1.69 kg)
- Drive bays matters most → the TS-233 (2 bays vs 1 bay)
More TS-131P leads
- Weight: 1.16 kg vs 1.69 kg
More TS-233 leads
- Max RAM: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Boost clock: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz
- Operating power: 10.8 W vs 11.6 W
Combined metrics
- Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): 1 Gbps on both
- Operating power per bay: TS-233 5.41 W vs 11.6 W
Combined metrics
- Weight per bay: TS-233 0.85 kg vs 1.16 kg
- Memory headroom (max minus base): 0 GB on both
Within 2%
- Volume: TS-131P 2.7 L, TS-233 2.69 L
Same on both
- max LAN speed 1 Gbps, LAN ports 1, USB ports 3, warranty 2 years
Use-case scores
- Small-office file server: TS-233 18 vs 7
- 10GbE video editing: TS-233 1 vs 0
- Low-power compact 24/7 use: TS-233 86 vs 85
Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.
FAQ
- Which takes more RAM, the QNAP TS-131P or the QNAP TS-233?
- The TS-233, with 2 GB against 1 GB for the TS-131P.
- Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TS-131P or the QNAP TS-233?
- The TS-233, with 2 bays against 1 bay for the TS-131P.
- Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-131P or the QNAP TS-233?
- The TS-233, with 10.8 W against 11.6 W for the TS-131P.
- Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-131P or the QNAP TS-233?
- The TS-131P, with 1.16 kg against 1.69 kg for the TS-233.
- Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-131P and the QNAP TS-233?
- Low-power compact 24/7 use: the TS-233. (based on our own use-case index)