As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)
QNAP TS-1277XU-RP vs QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP
The quick verdict
- Lower power drawQNAP TS-1277XU-RPdraws 106.7 W, 19.7 W less than the TVS-1672XU-RP
- Leads on more specsQNAP TS-1277XU-RP5 of 7 differing specs (CPU cores 6, boost clock 3.9 GHz)
- Best forTS-1277XU-RP for creators moving large video files fast
Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.
Spec ruler
In short
Bottom line. Of the 7 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-1277XU-RP leads on 5 (CPU cores, boost clock, weight, and 2 more) and the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP on 2 (drive bays and LAN ports). On our 10GbE video editing index, the TS-1277XU-RP scores 83/100 against 81/100.
Using the 13 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-1277XU-RP and QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP compare. Drive bays: the TVS-1672XU-RP at 16 bays versus 12 bays for the TS-1277XU-RP, 4 bays more (1.3x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TVS-1672XU-RP ranks in the top 7% and the TS-1277XU-RP in the top 15%. The TS-1277XU-RP leads on CPU cores, 6 cores to 4 cores, 1.5x. Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-1277XU-RP ranks in the top 13% and the TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 22%. On boost clock, the TS-1277XU-RP posts 3.9 GHz and the TVS-1672XU-RP 3.6 GHz, a gap of 0.3 GHz. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-1277XU-RP ranks in the top 18% and the TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 20%. LAN ports: the TVS-1672XU-RP at 6 ports versus 4 ports for the TS-1277XU-RP, 2 ports more (1.5x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TVS-1672XU-RP ranks in the top 1% and the TS-1277XU-RP in the top 18%.
Key differences 3
VolumeTS-1277XU-RP leads
- TS-1277XU-RP 23.9 L vs the TVS-1672XU-RP at 35.9 L
- the TS-1277XU-RP: 12 L smaller
- among 217 QNAP models: TS-1277XU-RP in the bottom 19%, TVS-1672XU-RP in the bottom 7%
11.9 L smaller on the shelf
CPU coresTS-1277XU-RP leads
- TS-1277XU-RP 6 cores vs the TVS-1672XU-RP at 4 cores
- the TS-1277XU-RP has 1.5x the CPU cores
- among 204 QNAP models: TS-1277XU-RP in the top 13%, TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 22%
6 cores for backups and transcodes at once
LAN portsTVS-1672XU-RP leads
- TVS-1672XU-RP 6 ports vs the TS-1277XU-RP at 4 ports
- the TVS-1672XU-RP has 1.5x the LAN ports
- among 219 QNAP models: TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 1%, TS-1277XU-RP in the top 18%
6 ports for link bonding or separate networks
Key specs at a glance
| Spec | TS-1277XU-RP | TVS-1672XU-RP |
|---|---|---|
| CPU cores | 6WINtop 13% | 4top 22% |
| LAN ports | 4top 18% | 6WINtop 1% |
| Volume | 23.9 LWINbottom 19% | 35.9 Lbottom 7% |
| Drive bays | 12top 15% | 16WINtop 7% |
| Operating power | 106.7 WWINbottom 21% | 126.3 Wbottom 15% |
| Weight | 13.7 kgWINbottom 15% | 15.4 kgbottom 9% |
Show every spec
| Spec | TS-1277XU-RP | TVS-1672XU-RP |
|---|---|---|
| Drive bays | 12top 15% | 16WINtop 7% |
| CPU cores | 6WINtop 13% | 4top 22% |
| Boost clock | 3.9 GHzWINtop 18% | 3.6 GHztop 20% |
| Base RAM | 8 GBtop 23% | 8 GBtop 23% |
| Max RAM | 64 GBtop 19% | 64 GBtop 19% |
| Max LAN speed | 10 Gbpstop 2% | 10 Gbpstop 2% |
| LAN ports | 4top 18% | 6WINtop 1% |
| PCIe slots | 4top 1% | 4top 1% |
| USB ports | 6top 4% | 6top 4% |
| Weight | 13.7 kgWINbottom 15% | 15.4 kgbottom 9% |
| Volume | 23.9 LWINbottom 19% | 35.9 Lbottom 7% |
| Operating power | 106.7 WWINbottom 21% | 126.3 Wbottom 15% |
| Warranty | 3 yrtop 7% | 3 yrtop 7% |
| Metric (0–100) | TS-1277XU-RP | TVS-1672XU-RP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance percentile | 88.5WIN | 79.4 |
| Lightness percentile | 14.2WIN | 8.1 |
| Compactness percentile | 16.4WIN | 5.6 |
| Home media server fit | No data | 0 |
| Small office fit | 100 | 100 |
| 10GbE video editing fit | 83WIN | 81 |
| Low-power compact 24/7 fit | 0 | 0 |
The details
How to choose
- Volume matters most → the TS-1277XU-RP (23.9 L vs 35.9 L)
- LAN ports matters most → the TVS-1672XU-RP (6 ports vs 4 ports)
More TS-1277XU-RP leads
- Operating power: 106.7 W vs 126.3 W
- Weight: 13.7 kg vs 15.4 kg
- Boost clock: 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
More TVS-1672XU-RP leads
- Drive bays: 16 bays vs 12 bays
Combined metrics
- Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TVS-1672XU-RP 24 Gbps vs 22 Gbps
- Operating power per bay: TVS-1672XU-RP 7.9 W vs 8.89 W
Combined metrics
- Weight per bay: TVS-1672XU-RP 0.96 kg vs 1.14 kg
- Memory headroom (max minus base): 56 GB on both
Same on both
- base RAM 8 GB, max RAM 64 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps
- PCIe slots 4, USB ports 6, warranty 3 years
Use-case scores
- 10GbE video editing: TS-1277XU-RP 83 vs 81
Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.
FAQ
- Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TS-1277XU-RP or the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP?
- The TVS-1672XU-RP, with 16 bays against 12 bays for the TS-1277XU-RP.
- Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-1277XU-RP or the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP?
- The TS-1277XU-RP, with 106.7 W against 126.3 W for the TVS-1672XU-RP.
- Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-1277XU-RP or the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP?
- The TS-1277XU-RP, with 13.7 kg against 15.4 kg for the TVS-1672XU-RP.
- Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-1277XU-RP and the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP?
- 10GbE video editing: the TS-1277XU-RP. (based on our own use-case index)