Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-1677XU-RP vs QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-1677XU-RP3 ahead
TVS-1672XU-RP2 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TVS-1672XU-RPdraws 126.3 W, 10.1 W less than the TS-1677XU-RP
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TS-1677XU-RP3 of 6 differing specs (CPU cores 8, boost clock 4.1 GHz)
  • Best forTS-1677XU-RP for creators moving large video files fast

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-1677XU-RP and the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 6 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-1677XU-RP leads on 3 (CPU cores, boost clock, and base RAM) and the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP on 2 (LAN ports and operating power); 1 is within 2%. On our 10GbE video editing index, the TS-1677XU-RP scores 84/100 against 81/100.

Using the 13 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-1677XU-RP and QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP compare. CPU cores: the TS-1677XU-RP at 8 cores versus 4 cores for the TVS-1672XU-RP, 4 cores more (2.0x). Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-1677XU-RP ranks in the top 3% and the TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 22%. The TS-1677XU-RP leads on boost clock, 4.1 GHz to 3.6 GHz. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-1677XU-RP ranks in the top 17% and the TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 20%. On base RAM, the TS-1677XU-RP posts 16 GB and the TVS-1672XU-RP 8 GB, a gap of 8 GB. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-1677XU-RP ranks in the top 14% and the TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 23%. LAN ports: the TVS-1672XU-RP at 6 ports versus 4 ports for the TS-1677XU-RP, 2 ports more (1.5x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TVS-1672XU-RP ranks in the top 1% and the TS-1677XU-RP in the top 18%.

Key differences 3

CPU coresTS-1677XU-RP leads

  • TS-1677XU-RP 8 cores vs the TVS-1672XU-RP at 4 cores
  • the TS-1677XU-RP has 2.0x the CPU cores
  • among 204 QNAP models: TS-1677XU-RP in the top 3%, TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 22%

8 cores for backups and transcodes at once

Base RAMTS-1677XU-RP leads

  • TS-1677XU-RP 16 GB vs the TVS-1672XU-RP at 8 GB
  • the TS-1677XU-RP has 2.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-1677XU-RP in the top 14%, TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 23%

16 GB out of the box for several apps

LAN portsTVS-1672XU-RP leads

  • TVS-1672XU-RP 6 ports vs the TS-1677XU-RP at 4 ports
  • the TVS-1672XU-RP has 1.5x the LAN ports
  • among 219 QNAP models: TVS-1672XU-RP in the top 1%, TS-1677XU-RP in the top 18%

6 ports for link bonding or separate networks

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-1677XU-RPTVS-1672XU-RP
CPU cores8WINtop 3%4top 22%
Base RAM16 GBWINtop 14%8 GBtop 23%
LAN ports4top 18%6WINtop 1%
Boost clock4.1 GHzWINtop 17%3.6 GHztop 20%
Operating power136.5 Wbottom 12%126.3 WWINbottom 15%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-1677XU-RPTVS-1672XU-RP
Drive bays16top 7%16top 7%
CPU cores8WINtop 3%4top 22%
Boost clock4.1 GHzWINtop 17%3.6 GHztop 20%
Base RAM16 GBWINtop 14%8 GBtop 23%
Max RAM64 GBtop 19%64 GBtop 19%
Max LAN speed10 Gbpstop 2%10 Gbpstop 2%
LAN ports4top 18%6WINtop 1%
PCIe slots4top 1%4top 1%
USB ports6top 4%6top 4%
Weight15.3 kgbottom 9%15.4 kgbottom 9%
Volume35.9 Lbottom 7%35.9 Lbottom 7%
Operating power136.5 Wbottom 12%126.3 WWINbottom 15%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%3 yrtop 7%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-1677XU-RPTVS-1672XU-RP
Performance percentile94WIN79.4
Lightness percentile8.5WIN8.1
Compactness percentile5.65.6
Home media server fitNo data0
Small office fit100100
10GbE video editing fit84WIN81
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • CPU cores matters most → the TS-1677XU-RP (8 cores vs 4 cores)
  • LAN ports matters most → the TVS-1672XU-RP (6 ports vs 4 ports)

More TS-1677XU-RP leads

  • Boost clock: 4.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz

More TVS-1672XU-RP leads

  • Operating power: 126.3 W vs 136.5 W

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TVS-1672XU-RP 24 Gbps vs 22 Gbps
  • Operating power per bay: TVS-1672XU-RP 7.9 W vs 8.53 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-1677XU-RP 0.95 kg vs 0.96 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TVS-1672XU-RP 56 GB vs 48 GB

Within 2%

  • Weight: TS-1677XU-RP 15.3 kg, TVS-1672XU-RP 15.4 kg

Same on both

  • drive bays 16, max RAM 64 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps, PCIe slots 4
  • USB ports 6, volume 35.9 L, warranty 3 years

Use-case scores

  • 10GbE video editing: TS-1677XU-RP 84 vs 81

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-1677XU-RP or the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP?
The TVS-1672XU-RP, with 126.3 W against 136.5 W for the TS-1677XU-RP.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-1677XU-RP and the QNAP TVS-1672XU-RP?
10GbE video editing: the TS-1677XU-RP. (based on our own use-case index)