Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TVS-472XT vs QNAP TVS-672N

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TVS-472XT4 ahead
TVS-672N2 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TVS-472XTdraws 37.3 W, 8.3 W less than the TVS-672N
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TVS-472XT4 of 6 differing specs (max RAM 64 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps)
  • Best forTVS-472XT for anyone running it 24/7 on little powerTVS-672N for small offices sharing files

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TVS-472XT and the QNAP TVS-672N on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 6 specs that differ, the QNAP TVS-472XT leads on 4 (max RAM, max LAN speed, volume, and 1 more) and the QNAP TVS-672N on 2 (drive bays and weight). On our small-office file server index, the TVS-672N scores 82/100 against 72/100.

Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TVS-472XT and QNAP TVS-672N compare. Drive bays: the TVS-672N at 6 bays versus 4 bays for the TVS-472XT, 2 bays more (1.5x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TVS-672N ranks in the bottom 43% and the TVS-472XT in the bottom 35%. The TVS-472XT leads on max RAM, 64 GB to 32 GB, 2.0x. Among 219 QNAP models, the TVS-472XT ranks in the top 19% and the TVS-672N in the top 50%. On max LAN speed, the TVS-472XT posts 10 Gbps and the TVS-672N 5 Gbps, a gap of 5 Gbps. Among 219 QNAP models, the TVS-472XT ranks in the top 2% and the TVS-672N in the bottom 48%. Weight: the TVS-672N at 6.55 kg versus 7.07 kg for the TVS-472XT, 0.52 kg lower. Among 212 QNAP models, the TVS-672N ranks in the top 37% and the TVS-472XT in the top 42%.

Key differences 3

Max RAMTVS-472XT leads

  • TVS-472XT 64 GB vs the TVS-672N at 32 GB
  • the TVS-472XT has 2.0x the max RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TVS-472XT in the top 19%, TVS-672N in the top 50%

Upgradable to 64 GB later

Max LAN speedTVS-472XT leads

  • TVS-472XT 10 Gbps vs the TVS-672N at 5 Gbps
  • the TVS-472XT is 2.0x faster
  • among 219 QNAP models: TVS-472XT in the top 2%, TVS-672N in the bottom 48%

100 GB copy: about 80 s vs about 3 min (theoretical)

Drive baysTVS-672N leads

  • TVS-672N 6 bays vs the TVS-472XT at 4 bays
  • the TVS-672N has 1.5x the drive bays
  • among 219 QNAP models: TVS-672N in the bottom 43%, TVS-472XT in the bottom 35%

With 8 TB drives: 48 TB vs 32 TB raw

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTVS-472XTTVS-672N
Max RAM64 GBWINtop 19%32 GBtop 50%
Max LAN speed10 GbpsWINtop 2%5 Gbpsbottom 48%
Drive bays4bottom 35%6WINbottom 43%
Volume10 LWINtop 37%13.9 Lbottom 49%
Operating power37.3 WWINtop 27%45.6 Wtop 33%
Weight7.07 kgtop 42%6.55 kgWINtop 37%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTVS-472XTTVS-672N
Drive bays4bottom 35%6WINbottom 43%
Base RAM4 GBbottom 47%4 GBbottom 47%
Max RAM64 GBWINtop 19%32 GBtop 50%
Max LAN speed10 GbpsWINtop 2%5 Gbpsbottom 48%
LAN ports3bottom 48%3bottom 48%
M.2 slots2top 4%2top 4%
PCIe slots2top 21%2top 21%
USB ports5top 18%5top 18%
Weight7.07 kgtop 42%6.55 kgWINtop 37%
Volume10 LWINtop 37%13.9 Lbottom 49%
Operating power37.3 WWINtop 27%45.6 Wtop 33%
Warranty2 yrbottom 35%2 yrbottom 35%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TVS-472XTTVS-672N
Lightness percentile58.862.8WIN
Compactness percentile62.5WIN47.5
Home media server fit9696
Small office fit7282WIN
Low-power compact 24/7 fit50WIN36

The details

How to choose

  • Max RAM matters most → the TVS-472XT (64 GB vs 32 GB)
  • Drive bays matters most → the TVS-672N (6 bays vs 4 bays)

More TVS-472XT leads

  • Volume: 10 L vs 13.9 L
  • Operating power: 37.3 W vs 45.6 W

More TVS-672N leads

  • Weight: 6.55 kg vs 7.07 kg

Combined metrics

  • Expansion slots in total (M.2 plus PCIe): 4 on both
  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TVS-472XT 12 Gbps vs 7 Gbps
  • Operating power per bay: TVS-672N 7.6 W vs 9.33 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TVS-672N 1.09 kg vs 1.77 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TVS-472XT 60 GB vs 28 GB

Same on both

  • base RAM 4 GB, LAN ports 3, M.2 slots 2
  • PCIe slots 2, USB ports 5, warranty 2 years

Use-case scores

  • Small-office file server: TVS-672N 82 vs 72
  • Low-power compact 24/7 use: TVS-472XT 50 vs 36

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which has the faster built-in LAN, the QNAP TVS-472XT or the QNAP TVS-672N?
The TVS-472XT, with 10 Gbps against 5 Gbps for the TVS-672N.
Which takes more RAM, the QNAP TVS-472XT or the QNAP TVS-672N?
The TVS-472XT, with 64 GB against 32 GB for the TVS-672N.
Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TVS-472XT or the QNAP TVS-672N?
The TVS-672N, with 6 bays against 4 bays for the TVS-472XT.
Which draws less power, the QNAP TVS-472XT or the QNAP TVS-672N?
The TVS-472XT, with 37.3 W against 45.6 W for the TVS-672N.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TVS-472XT and the QNAP TVS-672N?
A small-office file server: the TVS-672N. Low-power compact 24/7 use: the TVS-472XT. (based on our own use-case index)