As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)
QNAP TS-664 vs QNAP TS-932X
The quick verdict
- Leads on more specsQNAP TS-6645 of 9 differing specs (boost clock 2.9 GHz, USB ports 4)
- Best forTS-932X for small offices sharing files
Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.
Spec ruler
In short
Bottom line. Of the 9 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-664 leads on 5 (boost clock, USB ports, weight, and 2 more) and the QNAP TS-932X on 4 (drive bays, max LAN speed, LAN ports, and 1 more). On our small-office file server index, the TS-932X scores 92/100 against 78/100.
Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-664 and QNAP TS-932X compare. Drive bays: the TS-932X at 9 bays versus 6 bays for the TS-664, 3 bays more (1.5x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-932X ranks in the top 29% and the TS-664 in the bottom 43%. The TS-664 leads on boost clock, 2.9 GHz to 1.7 GHz, 1.7x. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-664 ranks in the top 39% and the TS-932X in the bottom 19%. On max LAN speed, the TS-932X posts 10 Gbps and the TS-664 2.5 Gbps, a gap of 7.5 Gbps. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-932X ranks in the top 2% and the TS-664 in the bottom 48%. LAN ports: the TS-932X at 4 ports versus 2 ports for the TS-664, 2 ports more (2.0x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-932X ranks in the top 18% and the TS-664 in the bottom 38%.
Key differences 3
Max LAN speedTS-932X leads
- TS-932X 10 Gbps vs the TS-664 at 2.5 Gbps
- the TS-932X is 4.0x faster
- among 219 QNAP models: TS-932X in the top 2%, TS-664 in the bottom 48%
100 GB copy: about 80 s vs about 5 min (theoretical)
LAN portsTS-932X leads
- TS-932X 4 ports vs the TS-664 at 2 ports
- the TS-932X has 2.0x the LAN ports
- among 219 QNAP models: TS-932X in the top 18%, TS-664 in the bottom 38%
4 ports for link bonding or separate networks
Boost clockTS-664 leads
- TS-664 2.9 GHz vs the TS-932X at 1.7 GHz
- the TS-664 is 1.7x higher
- among 201 QNAP models: TS-664 in the top 39%, TS-932X in the bottom 19%
Key specs at a glance
| Spec | TS-664 | TS-932X |
|---|---|---|
| Max LAN speed | 2.5 Gbpsbottom 48% | 10 GbpsWINtop 2% |
| LAN ports | 2bottom 38% | 4WINtop 18% |
| Boost clock | 2.9 GHzWINtop 39% | 1.7 GHzbottom 19% |
| Drive bays | 6bottom 43% | 9WINtop 29% |
| Warranty | 3 yrWINtop 7% | 2 yrbottom 35% |
| USB ports | 4WINtop 35% | 3bottom 27% |
Show every spec
| Spec | TS-664 | TS-932X |
|---|---|---|
| Drive bays | 6bottom 43% | 9WINtop 29% |
| CPU cores | 4top 22% | 4top 22% |
| Boost clock | 2.9 GHzWINtop 39% | 1.7 GHzbottom 19% |
| Base RAM | 8 GBtop 23% | 8 GBtop 23% |
| Max RAM | 16 GBbottom 48% | 16 GBbottom 48% |
| Max LAN speed | 2.5 Gbpsbottom 48% | 10 GbpsWINtop 2% |
| LAN ports | 2bottom 38% | 4WINtop 18% |
| M.2 slots | 2top 4% | – |
| PCIe slots | 1top 49% | – |
| USB ports | 4WINtop 35% | 3bottom 27% |
| Weight | 2.94 kgWINtop 20% | 3.53 kgtop 24% |
| Volume | 8.78 LWINtop 27% | 9.18 Ltop 33% |
| Operating power | 44 Wtop 31% | 42.2 WWINtop 30% |
| Warranty | 3 yrWINtop 7% | 2 yrbottom 35% |
| Metric (0–100) | TS-664 | TS-932X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance percentile | 39.6 | 41.4WIN |
| Lightness percentile | 80.1WIN | 75.8 |
| Compactness percentile | 72.7WIN | 66.7 |
| Home media server fit | 100 | No data |
| Small office fit | 78 | 92WIN |
| 10GbE video editing fit | 44 | 53WIN |
| Low-power compact 24/7 fit | 47 | 48WIN |
The details
How to choose
- Boost clock matters most → the TS-664 (2.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz)
- Max LAN speed matters most → the TS-932X (10 Gbps vs 2.5 Gbps)
More TS-664 leads (storage and connections)
- USB ports: 4 ports vs 3 ports
More TS-664 leads (size, power and warranty)
- Warranty: 3 years vs 2 years
- Weight: 2.94 kg vs 3.53 kg
- Volume: 8.78 L vs 9.18 L
More TS-932X leads
- Drive bays: 9 bays vs 6 bays
- Operating power: 42.2 W vs 44 W
Combined metrics
- Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TS-932X 22 Gbps vs 5 Gbps
- Operating power per bay: TS-932X 4.68 W vs 7.34 W
Combined metrics
- Weight per bay: TS-932X 0.39 kg vs 0.49 kg
- Memory headroom (max minus base): 8 GB on both
Same on both
- CPU cores 4, base RAM 8 GB, max RAM 16 GB
Use-case scores
- Small-office file server: TS-932X 92 vs 78
- 10GbE video editing: TS-932X 53 vs 44
- Low-power compact 24/7 use: TS-932X 48 vs 47
Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.
FAQ
- Which has the faster built-in LAN, the QNAP TS-664 or the QNAP TS-932X?
- The TS-932X, with 10 Gbps against 2.5 Gbps for the TS-664.
- Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TS-664 or the QNAP TS-932X?
- The TS-932X, with 9 bays against 6 bays for the TS-664.
- Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-664 or the QNAP TS-932X?
- The TS-932X, with 42.2 W against 44 W for the TS-664.
- Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-664 or the QNAP TS-932X?
- The TS-664, with 2.94 kg against 3.53 kg for the TS-932X.
- Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-664 and the QNAP TS-932X?
- A small-office file server: the TS-932X. 10GbE video editing: the TS-932X. (based on our own use-case index)