Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-873U-RP vs QNAP TVS-872XU

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-873U-RP2 ahead
TVS-872XU4 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TVS-872XUdraws 76.8 W, 30.9 W less than the TS-873U-RP
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TVS-872XU4 of 6 differing specs (boost clock 3.6 GHz, PCIe slots 4)
  • Best forTS-873U-RP for creators moving large video files fast

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-873U-RP and the QNAP TVS-872XU on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 6 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-873U-RP leads on 2 (base RAM and volume) and the QNAP TVS-872XU on 4 (boost clock, PCIe slots, weight, and 1 more). On our 10GbE video editing index, the TS-873U-RP scores 94/100 against 81/100.

Using the 13 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-873U-RP and QNAP TVS-872XU compare. Boost clock: the TVS-872XU at 3.6 GHz versus 2.1 GHz for the TS-873U-RP, 1.5 GHz higher (1.7x). Among 201 QNAP models, the TVS-872XU ranks in the top 20% and the TS-873U-RP in the bottom 31%. The TS-873U-RP leads on base RAM, 8 GB to 4 GB, 2.0x. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-873U-RP ranks in the top 23% and the TVS-872XU in the bottom 47%. On PCIe slots, the TVS-872XU posts 4 slots and the TS-873U-RP 1 slot, a gap of 3 slots. Among 146 QNAP models, the TVS-872XU ranks in the top 1% and the TS-873U-RP in the top 49%. Weight: the TVS-872XU at 10.9 kg versus 11.3 kg for the TS-873U-RP, 0.4 kg lower. Among 212 QNAP models, the TVS-872XU ranks in the bottom 31% and the TS-873U-RP in the bottom 26%.

Key differences 3

PCIe slotsTVS-872XU leads

  • TVS-872XU 4 slots vs the TS-873U-RP at 1 slot
  • the TVS-872XU has 4.0x the PCIe slots
  • among 146 QNAP models: TVS-872XU in the top 1%, TS-873U-RP in the top 49%

4 PCIe slot(s) for a 10GbE card later

Base RAMTS-873U-RP leads

  • TS-873U-RP 8 GB vs the TVS-872XU at 4 GB
  • the TS-873U-RP has 2.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-873U-RP in the top 23%, TVS-872XU in the bottom 47%

8 GB out of the box for several apps

Boost clockTVS-872XU leads

  • TVS-872XU 3.6 GHz vs the TS-873U-RP at 2.1 GHz
  • the TVS-872XU is 1.7x higher
  • among 201 QNAP models: TVS-872XU in the top 20%, TS-873U-RP in the bottom 31%

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-873U-RPTVS-872XU
PCIe slots1top 49%4WINtop 1%
Base RAM8 GBWINtop 23%4 GBbottom 47%
Boost clock2.1 GHzbottom 31%3.6 GHzWINtop 20%
Operating power107.7 Wbottom 20%76.8 WWINbottom 37%
Volume22.9 LWINbottom 28%23.9 Lbottom 19%
Weight11.3 kgbottom 26%10.9 kgWINbottom 31%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-873U-RPTVS-872XU
Drive bays8top 35%8top 35%
CPU cores4top 22%4top 22%
Boost clock2.1 GHzbottom 31%3.6 GHzWINtop 20%
Base RAM8 GBWINtop 23%4 GBbottom 47%
Max RAM64 GBtop 19%64 GBtop 19%
Max LAN speed10 Gbpstop 2%10 Gbpstop 2%
LAN ports6top 1%6top 1%
M.2 slots2top 4%–
PCIe slots1top 49%4WINtop 1%
USB ports6top 4%6top 4%
Weight11.3 kgbottom 26%10.9 kgWINbottom 31%
Volume22.9 LWINbottom 28%23.9 Lbottom 19%
Operating power107.7 Wbottom 20%76.8 WWINbottom 37%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%3 yrtop 7%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-873U-RPTVS-872XU
Performance percentile65.479.4WIN
Lightness percentile24.630.3WIN
Compactness percentile23.4WIN16.4
Home media server fitNo data31
Small office fit100100
10GbE video editing fit94WIN81
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • Base RAM matters most → the TS-873U-RP (8 GB vs 4 GB)
  • PCIe slots matters most → the TVS-872XU (4 slots vs 1 slot)

More TS-873U-RP leads

  • Volume: 22.9 L vs 23.9 L

More TVS-872XU leads

  • Operating power: 76.8 W vs 107.7 W
  • Weight: 10.9 kg vs 11.3 kg

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): 24 Gbps on both
  • Operating power per bay: TVS-872XU 9.6 W vs 13.5 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TVS-872XU 1.37 kg vs 1.41 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TVS-872XU 60 GB vs 56 GB

Same on both

  • drive bays 8, CPU cores 4, max RAM 64 GB, max LAN speed 10 Gbps
  • LAN ports 6, USB ports 6, warranty 3 years

Use-case scores

  • 10GbE video editing: TS-873U-RP 94 vs 81

Variant TVS-872XU-RP

  • matches the TVS-872XU on drive bays, CPU cores, boost clock, and 8 more but differs on weight (11.9 kg vs 10.9 kg) and operating power (90 W vs 76.8 W).
  • Where values differ, this comparison does not carry over to the TVS-872XU-RP.

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-873U-RP or the QNAP TVS-872XU?
The TVS-872XU, with 76.8 W against 107.7 W for the TS-873U-RP.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-873U-RP or the QNAP TVS-872XU?
The TVS-872XU, with 10.9 kg against 11.3 kg for the TS-873U-RP.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-873U-RP and the QNAP TVS-872XU?
10GbE video editing: the TS-873U-RP. (based on our own use-case index)