Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-1253DU-RP vs QNAP TS-853BU

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-1253DU-RP5 ahead
TS-853BU2 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TS-853BUdraws 52.1 W, 19.1 W less than the TS-1253DU-RP
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TS-1253DU-RP5 of 7 differing specs (drive bays 12, boost clock 2.7 GHz)
  • Best forTS-1253DU-RP for small offices sharing files

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-1253DU-RP and the QNAP TS-853BU on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 7 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-1253DU-RP leads on 5 (drive bays, boost clock, max LAN speed, and 2 more) and the QNAP TS-853BU on 2 (LAN ports and operating power). On our home media server index, the TS-853BU scores 31/100 against 26/100.

Using the 14 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-1253DU-RP and QNAP TS-853BU compare. Drive bays: the TS-1253DU-RP at 12 bays versus 8 bays for the TS-853BU, 4 bays more (1.5x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-1253DU-RP ranks in the top 15% and the TS-853BU in the top 35%. The TS-1253DU-RP leads on boost clock, 2.7 GHz to 2.3 GHz, 1.2x. Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-1253DU-RP ranks in the top 49% and the TS-853BU in the bottom 44%. On max LAN speed, the TS-1253DU-RP posts 2.5 Gbps and the TS-853BU 1 Gbps, a gap of 1.5 Gbps. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-1253DU-RP ranks in the bottom 48% and the TS-853BU in the bottom 22%. LAN ports: the TS-853BU at 4 ports versus 2 ports for the TS-1253DU-RP, 2 ports more (2.0x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-853BU ranks in the top 18% and the TS-1253DU-RP in the bottom 38%.

Key differences 3

Max LAN speedTS-1253DU-RP leads

  • TS-1253DU-RP 2.5 Gbps vs the TS-853BU at 1 Gbps
  • the TS-1253DU-RP is 2.5x faster
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-1253DU-RP in the bottom 48%, TS-853BU in the bottom 22%

100 GB copy: about 5 min vs about 13 min (theoretical)

LAN portsTS-853BU leads

  • TS-853BU 4 ports vs the TS-1253DU-RP at 2 ports
  • the TS-853BU has 2.0x the LAN ports
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-853BU in the top 18%, TS-1253DU-RP in the bottom 38%

4 ports for link bonding or separate networks

Drive baysTS-1253DU-RP leads

  • TS-1253DU-RP 12 bays vs the TS-853BU at 8 bays
  • the TS-1253DU-RP has 1.5x the drive bays
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-1253DU-RP in the top 15%, TS-853BU in the top 35%

With 8 TB drives: 96 TB vs 64 TB raw

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-1253DU-RPTS-853BU
Max LAN speed2.5 GbpsWINbottom 48%1 Gbpsbottom 22%
LAN ports2bottom 38%4WINtop 18%
Drive bays12WINtop 15%8top 35%
Operating power71.2 Wbottom 42%52.1 WWINtop 39%
Volume18.1 LWINbottom 39%22.9 Lbottom 28%
Boost clock2.7 GHzWINtop 49%2.3 GHzbottom 44%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-1253DU-RPTS-853BU
Drive bays12WINtop 15%8top 35%
CPU cores4top 22%4top 22%
Boost clock2.7 GHzWINtop 49%2.3 GHzbottom 44%
Base RAM4 GBbottom 47%4 GBbottom 47%
Max RAM8 GBbottom 25%8 GBbottom 25%
Max LAN speed2.5 GbpsWINbottom 48%1 Gbpsbottom 22%
LAN ports2bottom 38%4WINtop 18%
M.2 slots0bottom 46%0bottom 46%
PCIe slots1top 49%1top 49%
USB ports4top 35%4top 35%
Weight9.43 kgWINbottom 39%10 kgbottom 35%
Volume18.1 LWINbottom 39%22.9 Lbottom 28%
Operating power71.2 Wbottom 42%52.1 WWINtop 39%
Warranty3 yrtop 7%3 yrtop 7%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-1253DU-RPTS-853BU
Performance percentile24WIN17.2
Lightness percentile38.2WIN34.6
Compactness percentile37.7WIN23.4
Home media server fit2631WIN
Small office fit88WIN68
10GbE video editing fit25WIN23
Low-power compact 24/7 fit00

The details

How to choose

  • Max LAN speed matters most → the TS-1253DU-RP (2.5 Gbps vs 1 Gbps)
  • LAN ports matters most → the TS-853BU (4 ports vs 2 ports)

More TS-1253DU-RP leads

  • Volume: 18.1 L vs 22.9 L
  • Boost clock: 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
  • Weight: 9.43 kg vs 10 kg

More TS-853BU leads

  • Operating power: 52.1 W vs 71.2 W

Combined metrics

  • Expansion slots in total (M.2 plus PCIe): 1 on both
  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TS-1253DU-RP 5 Gbps vs 4 Gbps
  • Operating power per bay: TS-1253DU-RP 5.93 W vs 6.51 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-1253DU-RP 0.79 kg vs 1.25 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): 4 GB on both

Same on both

  • CPU cores 4, base RAM 4 GB, max RAM 8 GB, M.2 slots 0
  • PCIe slots 1, USB ports 4, warranty 3 years

Use-case scores

  • Home media server: TS-853BU 31 vs 26
  • Small-office file server: TS-1253DU-RP 88 vs 68
  • 10GbE video editing: TS-1253DU-RP 25 vs 23

Variant TS-853BU-RP

  • matches the TS-853BU on drive bays, CPU cores, boost clock, and 9 more but differs on weight (11.3 kg vs 10 kg) and operating power (63.3 W vs 52.1 W).
  • Where values differ, this comparison does not carry over to the TS-853BU-RP.

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which has the faster built-in LAN, the QNAP TS-1253DU-RP or the QNAP TS-853BU?
The TS-1253DU-RP, with 2.5 Gbps against 1 Gbps for the TS-853BU.
Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TS-1253DU-RP or the QNAP TS-853BU?
The TS-1253DU-RP, with 12 bays against 8 bays for the TS-853BU.
Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-1253DU-RP or the QNAP TS-853BU?
The TS-853BU, with 52.1 W against 71.2 W for the TS-1253DU-RP.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-1253DU-RP or the QNAP TS-853BU?
The TS-1253DU-RP, with 9.43 kg against 10 kg for the TS-853BU.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-1253DU-RP and the QNAP TS-853BU?
A small-office file server: the TS-1253DU-RP. (based on our own use-case index)