Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-932PX vs QNAP TVS-951X

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-932PX4 ahead
TVS-951X5 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TVS-951Xdraws 39.4 W, 3.6 W less than the TS-932PX
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TVS-951X5 of 9 differing specs (boost clock 1.8 GHz, max RAM 32 GB)
  • Best forTS-932PX for creators moving large video files fastTVS-951X for small offices sharing files

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-932PX and the QNAP TVS-951X on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 9 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-932PX leads on 4 (CPU cores, base RAM, LAN ports, and 1 more) and the QNAP TVS-951X on 5 (boost clock, max RAM, USB ports, and 2 more). On our small-office file server index, the TVS-951X scores 96/100 against 92/100.

Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-932PX and QNAP TVS-951X compare. CPU cores: the TS-932PX at 4 cores versus 2 cores for the TVS-951X, 2 cores more (2.0x). Among 204 QNAP models, the TS-932PX ranks in the top 22% and the TVS-951X in the bottom 9%. The TVS-951X leads on boost clock, 1.8 GHz to 1.7 GHz. Among 201 QNAP models, the TVS-951X ranks in the bottom 20% and the TS-932PX in the bottom 19%. On base RAM, the TS-932PX posts 4 GB and the TVS-951X 2 GB, a gap of 2 GB. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-932PX ranks in the bottom 47% and the TVS-951X in the bottom 14%. Max RAM: the TVS-951X at 32 GB versus 16 GB for the TS-932PX, 16 GB higher (2.0x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TVS-951X ranks in the top 50% and the TS-932PX in the bottom 48%.

Key differences 3

CPU coresTS-932PX leads

  • TS-932PX 4 cores vs the TVS-951X at 2 cores
  • the TS-932PX has 2.0x the CPU cores
  • among 204 QNAP models: TS-932PX in the top 22%, TVS-951X in the bottom 9%

4 cores for backups and transcodes at once

Base RAMTS-932PX leads

  • TS-932PX 4 GB vs the TVS-951X at 2 GB
  • the TS-932PX has 2.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-932PX in the bottom 47%, TVS-951X in the bottom 14%

4 GB out of the box for several apps

Max RAMTVS-951X leads

  • TVS-951X 32 GB vs the TS-932PX at 16 GB
  • the TVS-951X has 2.0x the max RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TVS-951X in the top 50%, TS-932PX in the bottom 48%

Upgradable to 32 GB later

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-932PXTVS-951X
CPU cores4WINtop 22%2bottom 9%
Base RAM4 GBWINbottom 47%2 GBbottom 14%
Max RAM16 GBbottom 48%32 GBWINtop 50%
LAN ports4WINtop 18%2bottom 38%
USB ports3bottom 27%4WINtop 35%
Weight4.66 kgtop 30%3.53 kgWINtop 24%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-932PXTVS-951X
Drive bays9top 29%9top 29%
CPU cores4WINtop 22%2bottom 9%
Boost clock1.7 GHzbottom 19%1.8 GHzWINbottom 20%
Base RAM4 GBWINbottom 47%2 GBbottom 14%
Max RAM16 GBbottom 48%32 GBWINtop 50%
Max LAN speed10 Gbpstop 2%10 Gbpstop 2%
LAN ports4WINtop 18%2bottom 38%
USB ports3bottom 27%4WINtop 35%
Weight4.66 kgtop 30%3.53 kgWINtop 24%
Volume8.88 LWINtop 29%9.18 Ltop 33%
Operating power43 Wtop 30%39.4 WWINtop 28%
Warranty2 yrbottom 35%2 yrbottom 35%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-932PXTVS-951X
Performance percentile41.4WIN30.5
Lightness percentile70.675.8WIN
Compactness percentile71.5WIN66.7
Home media server fitNo data67
Small office fit9296WIN
10GbE video editing fit53WIN51
Low-power compact 24/7 fit4850WIN

The details

How to choose

  • CPU cores matters most → the TS-932PX (4 cores vs 2 cores)
  • Max RAM matters most → the TVS-951X (32 GB vs 16 GB)

More TS-932PX leads

  • LAN ports: 4 ports vs 2 ports
  • Volume: 8.88 L vs 9.18 L

More TVS-951X leads (performance and memory)

  • Boost clock: 1.8 GHz vs 1.7 GHz

More TVS-951X leads (storage and connections)

  • USB ports: 4 ports vs 3 ports

More TVS-951X leads (size, power and warranty)

  • Weight: 3.53 kg vs 4.66 kg
  • Operating power: 39.4 W vs 43 W

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TS-932PX 25 Gbps vs 11 Gbps
  • Operating power per bay: TVS-951X 4.37 W vs 4.78 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TVS-951X 0.39 kg vs 0.52 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TVS-951X 30 GB vs 12 GB

Same on both

  • drive bays 9, max LAN speed 10 Gbps, warranty 2 years

Use-case scores

  • Small-office file server: TVS-951X 96 vs 92
  • 10GbE video editing: TS-932PX 53 vs 51
  • Low-power compact 24/7 use: TVS-951X 50 vs 48

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which takes more RAM, the QNAP TS-932PX or the QNAP TVS-951X?
The TVS-951X, with 32 GB against 16 GB for the TS-932PX.
Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-932PX or the QNAP TVS-951X?
The TVS-951X, with 39.4 W against 43 W for the TS-932PX.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-932PX or the QNAP TVS-951X?
The TVS-951X, with 3.53 kg against 4.66 kg for the TS-932PX.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-932PX and the QNAP TVS-951X?
A small-office file server: the TVS-951X. 10GbE video editing: the TS-932PX. Low-power compact 24/7 use: the TVS-951X. (based on our own use-case index)