Specotomy한국어

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress affiliate links.)

Home / NAS

QNAP TS-932PX vs QNAP TS-963X

Last updated:

The quick verdict

TS-932PX4 ahead
TS-963X3 ahead
  • Lower power drawQNAP TS-932PXdraws 43 W, 10.1 W less than the TS-963X
  • Leads on more specsQNAP TS-932PX4 of 7 differing specs (base RAM 4 GB, LAN ports 4)
  • Best forTS-963X for creators moving large video files fast

Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.

Spec ruler

Chart placing the QNAP TS-932PX and the QNAP TS-963X on a 0 to 100 ruler for each spec within the category
Longer bars mean a better value within the category (top %). The numbers are the actual specs.

In short

Bottom line. Of the 7 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-932PX leads on 4 (base RAM, LAN ports, volume, and 1 more) and the QNAP TS-963X on 3 (boost clock, USB ports, and weight). On our 10GbE video editing index, the TS-963X scores 55/100 against 53/100.

Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-932PX and QNAP TS-963X compare. Boost clock: the TS-963X at 2 GHz versus 1.7 GHz for the TS-932PX, 0.3 GHz higher (1.2x). Among 201 QNAP models, the TS-963X ranks in the bottom 27% and the TS-932PX in the bottom 19%. The TS-932PX leads on base RAM, 4 GB to 2 GB, 2.0x. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-932PX ranks in the bottom 47% and the TS-963X in the bottom 14%. On LAN ports, the TS-932PX posts 4 ports and the TS-963X 2 ports, a gap of 2 ports. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-932PX ranks in the top 18% and the TS-963X in the bottom 38%. USB ports: the TS-963X at 4 ports versus 3 ports for the TS-932PX, 1 port more (1.3x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-963X ranks in the top 35% and the TS-932PX in the bottom 27%.

Key differences 3

Base RAMTS-932PX leads

  • TS-932PX 4 GB vs the TS-963X at 2 GB
  • the TS-932PX has 2.0x the base RAM
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-932PX in the bottom 47%, TS-963X in the bottom 14%

4 GB out of the box for several apps

LAN portsTS-932PX leads

  • TS-932PX 4 ports vs the TS-963X at 2 ports
  • the TS-932PX has 2.0x the LAN ports
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-932PX in the top 18%, TS-963X in the bottom 38%

4 ports for link bonding or separate networks

USB portsTS-963X leads

  • TS-963X 4 ports vs the TS-932PX at 3 ports
  • the TS-963X has 1.3x the USB ports
  • among 219 QNAP models: TS-963X in the top 35%, TS-932PX in the bottom 27%

1 more USB for drives or a UPS

Key specs at a glance

Key specs at a glance
SpecTS-932PXTS-963X
Base RAM4 GBWINbottom 47%2 GBbottom 14%
LAN ports4WINtop 18%2bottom 38%
USB ports3bottom 27%4WINtop 35%
Weight4.66 kgtop 30%3.53 kgWINtop 24%
Operating power43 WWINtop 30%53.1 Wtop 40%
Boost clock1.7 GHzbottom 19%2 GHzWINbottom 27%
Show every spec
Full specifications
SpecTS-932PXTS-963X
Drive bays9top 29%9top 29%
CPU cores4top 22%4top 22%
Boost clock1.7 GHzbottom 19%2 GHzWINbottom 27%
Base RAM4 GBWINbottom 47%2 GBbottom 14%
Max RAM16 GBbottom 48%16 GBbottom 48%
Max LAN speed10 Gbpstop 2%10 Gbpstop 2%
LAN ports4WINtop 18%2bottom 38%
USB ports3bottom 27%4WINtop 35%
Weight4.66 kgtop 30%3.53 kgWINtop 24%
Volume8.88 LWINtop 29%9.18 Ltop 33%
Operating power43 WWINtop 30%53.1 Wtop 40%
Warranty2 yrbottom 35%2 yrbottom 35%
Derived metrics
Metric (0–100)TS-932PXTS-963X
Performance percentile41.451WIN
Lightness percentile70.675.8WIN
Compactness percentile71.5WIN66.7
Small office fit9292
10GbE video editing fit5355WIN
Low-power compact 24/7 fit48WIN39

The details

How to choose

  • Base RAM matters most → the TS-932PX (4 GB vs 2 GB)
  • USB ports matters most → the TS-963X (4 ports vs 3 ports)

More TS-932PX leads

  • Operating power: 43 W vs 53.1 W
  • Volume: 8.88 L vs 9.18 L

More TS-963X leads

  • Weight: 3.53 kg vs 4.66 kg
  • Boost clock: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz

Combined metrics

  • Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): TS-932PX 25 Gbps vs 11 Gbps
  • Operating power per bay: TS-932PX 4.78 W vs 5.9 W

Combined metrics

  • Weight per bay: TS-963X 0.39 kg vs 0.52 kg
  • Memory headroom (max minus base): TS-963X 14 GB vs 12 GB

Same on both

  • drive bays 9, CPU cores 4, max RAM 16 GB
  • max LAN speed 10 Gbps, warranty 2 years

Use-case scores

  • 10GbE video editing: TS-963X 55 vs 53
  • Low-power compact 24/7 use: TS-932PX 48 vs 39

Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.

FAQ

Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-932PX or the QNAP TS-963X?
The TS-932PX, with 43 W against 53.1 W for the TS-963X.
Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-932PX or the QNAP TS-963X?
The TS-963X, with 3.53 kg against 4.66 kg for the TS-932PX.
Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-932PX and the QNAP TS-963X?
10GbE video editing: the TS-963X. (based on our own use-case index)