As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (Also includes AliExpress and Coupang affiliate links; Coupang: 이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로, 이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.)
QNAP TS-253E vs QNAP TS-410E
The quick verdict
- Lower power drawQNAP TS-410Edraws 22.7 W, 1.5 W less than the TS-253E
- Leads on more specsQNAP TS-410E3 of 5 differing specs (drive bays 4, volume 2.6 L)
- Best forTS-410E for people who keep movies and photos at home
Rankings and scores come from the specs alone and are not affected by affiliate commissions.
Spec ruler
In short
Bottom line. Of the 5 specs that differ, the QNAP TS-253E leads on 2 (max RAM and weight) and the QNAP TS-410E on 3 (drive bays, volume, and operating power). On our home media server index, the TS-410E scores 100/100 against 76/100.
Using the 12 specs published on QNAP's official hardware specification pages, here is how the QNAP TS-253E and QNAP TS-410E compare. Drive bays: the TS-410E at 4 bays versus 2 bays for the TS-253E, 2 bays more (2.0x). Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-410E ranks in the bottom 35% and the TS-253E in the bottom 11%. The TS-253E leads on max RAM, 16 GB to 8 GB, 2.0x. Among 219 QNAP models, the TS-253E ranks in the bottom 48% and the TS-410E in the bottom 25%. On weight, the TS-253E posts 2.57 kg and the TS-410E 3.87 kg, a gap of 1.3 kg. Among 212 QNAP models, the TS-253E ranks in the top 18% and the TS-410E in the top 26%. Volume: the TS-410E at 2.6 L versus 3.71 L for the TS-253E, 1.11 L lower (1.4x). Among 217 QNAP models, the TS-410E ranks in the top 3% and the TS-253E in the top 6%.
Key differences 3
Drive baysTS-410E leads
- TS-410E 4 bays vs the TS-253E at 2 bays
- the TS-410E has 2.0x the drive bays
- among 219 QNAP models: TS-410E in the bottom 35%, TS-253E in the bottom 11%
With 8 TB drives: 32 TB vs 16 TB raw
Max RAMTS-253E leads
- TS-253E 16 GB vs the TS-410E at 8 GB
- the TS-253E has 2.0x the max RAM
- among 219 QNAP models: TS-253E in the bottom 48%, TS-410E in the bottom 25%
Upgradable to 16 GB later
WeightTS-253E leads
- TS-253E 2.57 kg vs the TS-410E at 3.87 kg
- the TS-253E: 1.3 kg lighter
- among 212 QNAP models: TS-253E in the top 18%, TS-410E in the top 26%
1.3 kg lighter (about 1 1.5 L bottles)
Key specs at a glance
| Spec | TS-253E | TS-410E |
|---|---|---|
| Drive bays | 2bottom 11% | 4WINbottom 35% |
| Max RAM | 16 GBWINbottom 48% | 8 GBbottom 25% |
| Weight | 2.57 kgWINtop 18% | 3.87 kgtop 26% |
| Volume | 3.71 Ltop 6% | 2.6 LWINtop 3% |
| Operating power | 24.2 Wtop 13% | 22.7 WWINtop 11% |
Show every spec
| Spec | TS-253E | TS-410E |
|---|---|---|
| Drive bays | 2bottom 11% | 4WINbottom 35% |
| CPU cores | 4top 22% | 4top 22% |
| Boost clock | 2.6 GHzbottom 47% | 2.6 GHzbottom 47% |
| Base RAM | 8 GBtop 23% | 8 GBtop 23% |
| Max RAM | 16 GBWINbottom 48% | 8 GBbottom 25% |
| Max LAN speed | 2.5 Gbpsbottom 48% | 2.5 Gbpsbottom 48% |
| LAN ports | 2bottom 38% | 2bottom 38% |
| M.2 slots | 2top 4% | – |
| USB ports | 4top 35% | 4top 35% |
| Weight | 2.57 kgWINtop 18% | 3.87 kgtop 26% |
| Volume | 3.71 Ltop 6% | 2.6 LWINtop 3% |
| Operating power | 24.2 Wtop 13% | 22.7 WWINtop 11% |
| Warranty | 3 yrtop 7% | 3 yrtop 7% |
| Metric (0–100) | TS-253E | TS-410E |
|---|---|---|
| Performance percentile | 28.4WIN | 21.4 |
| Lightness percentile | 82.5WIN | 73.9 |
| Compactness percentile | 94.2 | 97.7WIN |
| Home media server fit | 76 | 100WIN |
| Small office fit | 50 | 60WIN |
| 10GbE video editing fit | 22WIN | 4 |
| Low-power compact 24/7 fit | 73 | 77WIN |
The details
How to choose
- Max RAM matters most → the TS-253E (16 GB vs 8 GB)
- Drive bays matters most → the TS-410E (4 bays vs 2 bays)
More TS-410E leads
- Volume: 2.6 L vs 3.71 L
- Operating power: 22.7 W vs 24.2 W
Combined metrics
- Total built-in LAN bandwidth (sum of port speeds): 5 Gbps on both
- Operating power per bay: TS-410E 5.67 W vs 12.1 W
Combined metrics
- Weight per bay: TS-410E 0.97 kg vs 1.29 kg
- Memory headroom (max minus base): TS-253E 8 GB vs 0 GB
Same on both
- CPU cores 4, boost clock 2.6 GHz, base RAM 8 GB, max LAN speed 2.5 Gbps
- LAN ports 2, USB ports 4, warranty 3 years
Use-case scores
- Home media server: TS-410E 100 vs 76
- Small-office file server: TS-410E 60 vs 50
Use-case scores
- 10GbE video editing: TS-253E 22 vs 4
- Low-power compact 24/7 use: TS-410E 77 vs 73
Use-case scores are Specotomy's own index, computed by fixed rules from official manufacturer specs; they are not manufacturer scores.
FAQ
- Which takes more RAM, the QNAP TS-253E or the QNAP TS-410E?
- The TS-253E, with 16 GB against 8 GB for the TS-410E.
- Which has more drive bays, the QNAP TS-253E or the QNAP TS-410E?
- The TS-410E, with 4 bays against 2 bays for the TS-253E.
- Which draws less power, the QNAP TS-253E or the QNAP TS-410E?
- The TS-410E, with 22.7 W against 24.2 W for the TS-253E.
- Which is lighter, the QNAP TS-253E or the QNAP TS-410E?
- The TS-253E, with 2.57 kg against 3.87 kg for the TS-410E.
- Which use cases suit the QNAP TS-253E and the QNAP TS-410E?
- A home media server: the TS-410E. A small-office file server: the TS-410E. Low-power compact 24/7 use: the TS-410E. (based on our own use-case index)